Ubuntu 9.10 on SSD
I've been thinking about replacing the hard disk on my production notebook with a solid-state disk (SSD) for quite a while. So when I stumbled upon a good offer on Kingston 64GB SSDNow V series SSD I decided to take the plunge. 64GB is a far cry from the modest by today's standards 160GB hard disk on my notebook. But since I store all my files on a Bubba Two server, I rarely use more than 15-20GB anyway. The Kingston 64GB SSDNow V series SSD model is available in several versions, including a so-called notebook kit. It's slightly more expensive than the disk itself, but it's well worth a few extra bucks. The notebook kit includes hard disk cloning software (which is, obviously, of no use on Linux) and a hard disk enclosure. The latter is a very handy addition, as you can use it to convert the replaced hard disk into an external USB drive. So I pulled the old hard disk out of the notebook, inserted it into the enclosure, and moved files and profiles to the freshly installed SSD. The entire procedure of installing the SSD and moving the files took no longer than half an hour.
While I was hoping to get a slight speed boost, my expectations weren't very high: the Kingston V-series SSD is designed for the consumer market and the disk offers relatively modest read/write speeds. I was therefore pleasantly surprised when the Ubuntu 9.10's installer zoomed through the installation process in about 10 minutes -- almost twice as fast as with the old hard disk. And I was completely blown away by how fast my notebook booted into Ubuntu 9.10 -- it took about 10-15 seconds. Still skeptical, I launched OpenOffice.org. Yep, it started noticeably faster than before. I haven't done any scientific measurements, but I can say that switching to the SSD disk has had a more significant impact on the system's performance than doubling the amount of RAM.
So if you are considering replacing the conventional hard disk on your machine with an SSD, I say go for it. Before you make the move, though, you might want to do some research to find the SSD model that fits your needs and budget.
Comments
Access times vs throughput
gfqsfdsf Nov 28, 2009 12:03pm GMT
There is more than throughput to storage devices.SSD's have ridiculously low access times, which speeds everything up significantly.
Even if they don't have a very high throughput.
btrfs
mario Nov 25, 2009 9:19pm GMT
You can save even more power and get MUCH higher speed, if you use a btrfs filesystem with compression enabled.Power consumption
Transmogrifox Nov 25, 2009 7:21pm GMT
I noticed the 40GB drive has significantly less power requirement than the 64GB drive. At first I thought it must be a typo in the specs, but realized the read/write speeds are significantly less. At the same time, the r/w speeds seem to be on par with the average consumer mag hard drive.If your aim is power saving with speed secondary, then get 40G drive.
And you may say "Well, it takes the same number of cycles to write a 3 GB file no matter what the speed, so the same energy is drained from the battery" . This is true, but the 40G also has lower idle power consumption, simply due to less memory to leak power in the idle state.
Get over the anxiety
Greg P Nov 25, 2009 5:21pm GMT
I bought a stock Dell netbook with a 16GB SSD, loaded with Ubuntu, and have had no problems, so you just don't need 64GB (necessarily).Furthermore, what I did later was to replace the Ubuntu with Fedora 11, in the process wiping out the wasted 5GB of wasted rescue partition that Dell sent it with. So really, Ubuntu did quite fine with the 11GB it had to work with. I am not seeing any issues with boot or shutdown times.
testing speeds
jason Nov 25, 2009 4:29pm GMT
Could you run some file copy speed tests and give us the details please on your driveMounting SSD drives
DoctorPepper Nov 25, 2009 4:05pm GMT
If you haven't done so, set the "noatime" option in the mount line for the slices on your SSD drive in /etc/fstab. This prevents the inodes from being updated each time a file is accessed, and should make your SSD last longer.I have a 16GB SSD on my Dell Mini-9 netbook, and set this option when I installed UNR.
SSD
Phil Ferrar Nov 25, 2009 3:49pm GMT
I too replaced my old Samsung V20 laptop's HD a few months ago with a 60gb SSD that I got on eBay for about £60. It has just 1meg of memory which is more than enough as I run Ubuntu 9.10 and just about everything is stored in the 'cloud' [Google Docs, Picasa etc.] so the disc is never more that about 1/3rd full. Boot times are brilliant [sub 20 seconds] so you don't even have to bother hibernating or whatever.SSD's rock
Cliff Nov 25, 2009 1:59pm GMT
I installed a SSD on my machine as well with Ubuntu its really fast.I installed Linux and the Boot loader to the SSD and use my old 500gb magnetic drive as my my home drive.
It boots really, really fast.
I should have only bought a 32gb drive though instead of the big expensive one I bought.
What about battery life?
KBill Nov 25, 2009 1:45pm GMT
Has the battery life improved? I slightly played a couple of days ago with Moblin off a USB stick and it didn´t seem to make the batt last for much longer (if any) than the HD...TIA
SSD
VH-BIL Nov 25, 2009 10:42am GMT
I have been running a 128Gig SSD for a while, it has been pretty good.Tweaking
Andrea R Nov 25, 2009 9:36am GMT
Disable the readahead service, set the noop IO scheduler and try different filesystems on it...