$arr_19 ), array( 3, false, $arr_20, $arr_24 ), array( 2, false, "\" />", $arr_25 ) ) ); ?> $arr_27 ), array( 3, false, $arr_28, $arr_30 ), array( 2, false, "\" />\n\n", $arr_31 ) ) ); ?> array( 2, false, false, $arr_9 ), array( 4, $arr_10, "if", $arr_245, $arr_248 ), array( 2, false, "\n", $arr_249 ) ) ); ?> rr_466 ), array( 4, $arr_467, "if", $arr_482, $arr_484 ), array( 2, false, "\n", $arr_485 ) ) ); ?> Zack’s Kernel News » Linux Magazine
 

Disposition of Binary-Only Modules; Seeking kernel.org Features; Remounting Oddities; PohmelFS Rewritten from Scratch; Device Isolation Groups

Zack’s Kernel News

Author(s):

Chronicler Zack Brown reports on the latest news, views, dilemmas, and developments within the Linux kernel community.

There’s an interesting legal question surrounding the Linux kernel: Are third-party, binaryonly kernel modules a violation of the GNU General Public License? The question has not been settled in court one way or the other, but I imagine it ultimately will be.

Read full article as PDF »

092-093_kernelnews.pdf (2.00 MB)
comments powered by Disqus

Direct Download

Read full article as PDF »

092-093_kernelnews.pdf (2.00 MB)

News