You Wave "Good-bye" and I Wave "Hello"
Paw Prints: Writings of the maddog
A new blog posting from Google points to the fact that the highly touted “Wave” project has been terminated, and the general philosophy around this seems to be that “Wave” was a failure.
I was one of the people who looked at Wave and tried to figure out how it fit into my daily life. I tried using it from time to time, but in my life I am “off the net” so frequently that the real-time and high-bandwidth aspects of Wave left me cold and feeling like a fish washed up on shore.
The fact that Wave was not integrated into any other thing that Google was working on also made Wave painful for me, and created the decision point of whether I met up with people on email, some chat protocol, or Wave? What if that person or people did not “do” Wave? I (and my collegues) were left with indecision.
Google, not seeing the “adoption” that they had hoped, has decided not to continue developing Wave as a stand-alone tool.
With all of that, I do not feel that “Wave” was a failure. In a lot of ways Google was demonstrating what a lot of FOSS projects do, “release early and often”, just on a larger and more visible scale. Since Google had been successful in a lot of other projects like Wave, others just climbed on the bandwagon, ignoring for a bit the concepts of “Alpha” and “Beta” code.
Google has said that the most innovative parts of Wave (the drag-and-drop and character-by-character live typing) is Open Source and they may try to integrate these into other products. Even if they do not, the fact the code is Open Source would allow others to integrate the code independent of what Google does.
I spent sixteen years of my life working for Digital Equipment Corporation. While that company is now gone, some of its innovations and technologies live on in Intel and ARM processors, and in various parts of different operating systems. If this was not true, I would be very depressed. However, even more technologies (both hardware and software) could have survived if those technologies had been “Open”, and that is what Google is doing.
So I, for one, encourage Google to keep innovating, and putting those innovations out as FOSS. While some may not become products immediately, many more will be available for discussion and use in other ways that even the Google engineers may not have envisioned.
Carpe Diem!comments powered by Disqus
A new study says it is possible to unmask 81% of TOR users.
Redmond joins the revolution by turning the .NET Core Runtime into a GitHub project.
Users only had 7 hours to update before the intrusions started.
It's official: The new web arrives
Kernel king admits his tone has alienated volunteers, but says the demands of the process require directness.
New flaw in an old encryption scheme leaves the experts scrambling to disable SSL 3
Lennart Poettering wants to change the way Linux developers talk to each other.
Enterprise giant frees itself from ink and home PCs (and visa versa).
Mozilla’s product think tank sinks silently into history.
TODO group will focus on open source tools in large-scale environments.