Seeing the forest with tree
In Full View
The tree command can provide a clear view of all your files and directories and offers a few advantages over the usual ls command.
tree command  is a tool that I'd overlooked until recently. After trying it for several weeks, however, I am starting to prefer its tree-like display of directories and files to the plain lists generated by
Part of the reason is that, in these GUI-oriented days, even a directory tree made with ASCII characters is more comfortable than no structural display at all. The functional differences between
ls are minimal. The two commands share a few options, such as
-a for displaying all files, and even when the options are different, the functionality remains similar. The largest exception I have noticed is that
ls offers an option for the number of columns in which to display results; the
tree display makes a single column unavoidable.
You have to look closely to see the differences, but
tree is consistently more versatile, starting with, unlike
ls, recursion. By default,
tree displays all files in all subdirectories.
ls, tree is part of the standard installation for most distributions. If yours does not include it, or if you want the absolutely latest version, you can download the source code from the project site to compile.
Without any options or target directory to view, tree lists the current directory. Alternatively, you can specify a directory to be the top level in the display (Figure 1).
Unless you know that the directories you are viewing contain only a few files, you will almost certainly want to pipe it through
less, so that you can scroll back and forth in the results.
The basic command structure is:
tree OPTIONS TOP-DIRECTORY | less
However, this structure is only the beginning. Tree also includes extensive options for adjusting how results are displayed, how the command operates, how files are listed, and how files are sorted.
If your environment includes
LS_COLORS, the display uses the same color codes as
ls (blue for directories, white for general files, red for archived files, green for an uncompiled script). One of the most obvious advantages over
ls is that an archived file is treated as subdirectory file, so you can read its files directly from
tree. The output ends with the total number of directories and files displayed.
You can modify this default display in several ways. Adding the
-n option after the basic command turns colorization off, whereas
-C restores it. Using
-i suppresses indentation for directories, giving similar results to
ls in a single column, and
--noreport removes the final count of directories and files.
tree does not include the last time a file or directory was modified. However, you add the information with
--timefmt FORMAT. The
--timefmt option uses the formats defined in
strftime , a standard convention for displaying date and time. Strftime includes dozens of options, but
%c (the default time and date for the current system's locale) or
%d/%m/%y (day/month/year) are two of the most useful for the date, and
%T (for a 24-hour clock) for time. If none of these options are what you want, consult the
strftime man page for a complete list of options.
tree displays all non-hidden files and directories below the directory you specify. However, you can modify how
tree handles different aspects of the directory tree in several ways.
To start, you can add the
-a option to list hidden files, just as you can with
ls. At the opposite extreme,
-d lists only directories. Add
--prune, and results can become sparser yet, with no empty directories displayed. Other options limit the input to
-L LEVEL, you can limit the directory depth to display (Figure 2). The option
--filelimit NUMBER imposes a similar restriction, displaying only directories with more than the stated number of entries. If your hard drive is partitioned with LVM or uses RAID,
-x will restrict results only tho those on the current filesystem.
tree command also uses basic wildcards when the
-P option is used, such as
* for zero or more characters,
? for any single character, and a list or range of characters within square brackets (e.g.,
[5-6]). When the contents of the brackets begin with a
^, then the search is for a single character not listed in the brackets.
Whatever options you use,
-o=FILENAME saves the results to a file. Tree saves in XML format by default, but if necessary,
-x will turn XML output back on. Alternatively,
-H BASEHREF turns on HTML output, which can be handy for referencing an HTML or FTP site. When you do choose HTML output,
--nolinks turns off hyperlinks in the output file, and
-T TITLE sets the title and first level header in the output file to HTML.
Many of these options can be especially useful if you have some knowledge of the directory structure and want to eliminate large segments of the structure as you search for particular files and directories. In my experience, they are best used in separate sweeps of the directory tree so that one does not interfere with another.
File Output Options
Tree gives you the choice of substituting non-printable characters in results with a question mark (
-q) or printing them as is (
-N). You also have the option of printing file names with double-quotation marks around them (
-Q), which can be convenient if a file title uses spaces and you plan to copy and paste it for use in another command (Figure 3).
Colorblind users might also prefer to include
-F in the command, to print symbols to identify file types – for example,
/ for directories.
However, most of
tree's file output options display meta-information. With
tree prints the user ID (UIF), and
-g prints the group ID (GID), as shown in Figure 4. If your interest is in file sizes, then
-s prints them in bytes, and
-h shows them in the most suitable unit readable for humans:
K specifying kilobytes,
M for megabytes,
G for gigabytes, and so on.
You can also include in the output the disk usage for each directory with
-du or show the device number for each result with
Buy this article as PDF
Report from the X-Force group says attackers are using TOR to hide their crimes
Future Firefox extensions will be compatible with Chrome.
Better read this if you bought your computer before 2011
Users should upgrade to the new version as soon as possible
Xen project announces a privilege escalation problem for Qemu host systems
Attackers can compromise an Android phone just by sending a text message
PC vendor will pre-install Ubuntu on portables in India.
More embarrassment for Adobe's embattled multimedia tool
Mozilla’s script blocker add-on could be putting malware sites on the whitelist.
The Internet community officially banishes the notoriously unsafe Secure Sockets Layer protocol.