Welcome

Welcome

Article from Issue 221/2019
Author(s):

As this issue goes to print, news is circulating about a catastrophic hack on the mail provider VFEmail. According to reports, two decades of saved data for all US users is lost – totally wiped out.

Bricks and Spray Paint

Dear Reader,

As this issue goes to print, news is circulating about a catastrophic hack on the mail provider VFEmail. According to reports, two decades of saved data for all US users is lost – totally wiped out. Email providers are accustomed to getting attacked, and most of the attacks are stopped at the front door. Attackers sometimes get through, in which case, the most common scenario is that they encrypt some data and ask for a ransom. In this case, however, the attacker didn't seem to really want anything, other than a chance to go on a rampage and destroy all the data.

No attempt was made to deliver ransom demands. The crime did not look like extortion or theft but resembled something more like ordinary vandalism. The attacker careened around the network, reformatting disks and destroying data. Mail servers, file servers, VM servers, database servers, and even backup servers were lost. Although vandalism tends to appear random, this attack seems to have been carefully planned. According to reports, the attacker needed multiple passwords to access all these servers and therefore must have been lurking and listening on the network for some time to acquire the necessary access information.

I won't solve the mystery in the time it takes to write this column. Too much is unknown at this time. Was the attack from a disturbed loner who just wanted to destroy something? Was it a disgruntled customer or a former employee out for revenge? Was it an inside job? Another possible scenario is that the attacker was a customer with a secret who decided to destroy the evidence by destroying every account, rather than just deleting personal emails and risking leaving a trail.

The VFEmail attack caught the imagination of the high tech press because it was just so weird. Nefarious as ransomware attacks might be, we are at least able to classify them as being somehow related to the quest for money (which we all secretly understand). A wanton attack of vengeance or vandalism scares us the way we are scared by a tornado or a madman with a knife. This attack underscores the dark reality that the Internet really is an unsafe place. Criminals and sociopaths from all over the world can ride a magic carpet to your front door, and the onus is on you to find the right kind of lock – and to continually change the lock as new techniques render old locks ineffective. It is actually profoundly strange that our whole economy and trillions of dollars in business interests are based on this model.

Still, VFEmail deserves some heat for the failure of their disaster recovery plan. If you read down through the comments under the news stories on the attack, you'll find lots of notes from sys admins who are unimpressed that such a thing could happen. Without the details, it is difficult to see exactly what went wrong. At least so far, there doesn't seem to be an obvious gotcha-type mistake, such as an unpatched server or sloppy password policy. Two issues are clear at this time and should serve as a cautionary tale for other admins as they prepare for what we hope will not be a new era of stone-age-style, destroy everything attacks:

  • Although the company did provide regular backups to backup servers located on the network, their backup process apparently did not include an offline storage component, which is often (though not universally) recommended by security experts.
  • Unless the attack was an inside job, the intruder spent some time hanging out on the network snooping passwords. (Note that this is not a disaster recovery problem but is more of an intrusion prevention problem.)

Another question that no one seems to be asking is to what degree this story reflects a growing trend in our IT industry, which favors huge providers over small to mid-size businesses. Based on comments and responses that have appeared in the press, it appears to be a fairly small-time operation. Fifteen years ago, there were thousands of small businesses operated by the owner and a small team providing services on the Internet. Are we now approaching a world in which every company needs to be big enough to employ a professional security expert and full-time security staff just to watch for intruders?

Then again, it is worth asking if losing email to a cyberattack is actually any worse than losing your credit card number, which seems to happen quite frequently with big companies who have lots of money for security experts.

Joe Casad, Editor in Chief

Buy this article as PDF

Express-Checkout as PDF
Price $2.95
(incl. VAT)

Buy Linux Magazine

SINGLE ISSUES
 
SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
TABLET & SMARTPHONE APPS
Get it on Google Play

US / Canada

Get it on Google Play

UK / Australia

Related content

  • Drupal Advisory Unleashes a Torrent of Attacks

    Users only had 7 hours to update before the intrusions started.

  • Honeynet

    Security-conscious admins can use a honeynet to monitor, log, and analyze intrusion techniques.

  • Intrusion 101

    You need to think like an attacker to keep your network safe. We asked security columnist Kurt Seifried for an inside look at the art of intrusion.

  • DDoS Defense

    To ward off DDoS attacks, websites and services often seek the protection of Internet giants, such as Amazon, but you have other ways to protect your connectivity.

  • News

    Updates on Technologies, Trends, and Tools

comments powered by Disqus

Direct Download

Read full article as PDF:

Price $2.95

News