ADMIN - Explore the new world of system administration! Special introductory offer! Order by September 30th to save 10% off the regular subscription price! Each issue delivers technical solutions to the real-world problems you face every day. Learn the latest techniques for better:
network security
system management
troubleshooting
performance tuning
virtualization
cloud computing
on Windows, Linux, Solaris, and popular varieties of Unix.
A Linux kernel bug in network socket initialization could allow an attacker to acquire root privileges to inflict damages. The security hole applies to all kernels of the 2.4 and 2.6 series and has been around possibly since 2001.
Source of the bug is a NULL pointer dereference caused by an incorrectly implemented function during socket initialization. Pointers should have redirected the function to a predefined stub routine, but some protocols leave these pointers uninitialized. The list of affected protocols is pretty long: Appletalk, IPX, X.25, IRDA, Bluetooth, ISDN, AX25, SCTP via IPv6 and IUCV, although there may be more.
The kernel validates the pointers before executing most of the relevant functions. However, it was found that the sock_sendpage() routine bybasses the validation and accepts the NULL pointer. An attacker can thereby inflict some damage with code on the first page executed with root privileges. A precondition, however, is that the attacker already has code modification privileges as user, which precludes any remote attack possibilities.
A few exploits were already prepared for the vulnerability, but a relevant kernel patch now exists in Git. Most distros should implement their own security patches for the affected protocols for their delivered kernel versions.
"t's been found, and it's been fixed. In addition it was never exploited, as it was never found until recently, had it been found earlier it would have been fixed earlier.
If on the other hand it had been known about and exploits available, and it had never been fixed,then there would be something to get upset about."
The comment above may be a bit naive? Just because it was not found by kernel developers until recently does not mean that the bug may not have been exploited.
Why
Tracyanne
Aug 16, 2009 6:11am GMT
It's been found, and it's been fixed. In addition it was never exploited, as it was never found until recently, had it been found earlier it would have been fixed earlier.
If on the other hand it had been known about and exploits available, and it had never been fixed,then there would be something to get upset about.
kernel typo - (I hope)
Mike
Aug 15, 2009 6:23am GMT
Uh, that applies to all kernels of the 2.4 - 2.6 series...
quote: "2.6, from 2.6.0 up to and including 2.6.30.4"
I hope this was just a typo, because leaving out that it affects the 2.6 series would be a large blunder.
Stop by Rikki's Open Source Exchange for dispatches from the world of women in open source.
Rikki Kite examines the experience of women across the spectrum of open source – the people, projects, organizations, events, articles, issues, and news.
Comments
great post
peer Oct 25, 2010 7:14am GMT
Thanks a lot for sharing the article on cash. That's a awesome article. I enjoyed the article a lot while reading. Thanks for sharing such a wonderful article.I want to say very thank you for this great informations. now i understand about it. Thank you !http://www.cocoschanel.com
http://www.gucciguccis.com
http://www.urboots.com
http://www.handbags2012.com
http://www.louisvuittonslv.com
http://www.uggmalls.com
Naivete
abcd Aug 16, 2009 12:08pm GMT
"t's been found, and it's been fixed. In addition it was never exploited, as it was never found until recently, had it been found earlier it would have been fixed earlier.If on the other hand it had been known about and exploits available, and it had never been fixed,then there would be something to get upset about."
The comment above may be a bit naive? Just because it was not found by kernel developers until recently does not mean that the bug may not have been exploited.
Why
Tracyanne Aug 16, 2009 6:11am GMT
It's been found, and it's been fixed. In addition it was never exploited, as it was never found until recently, had it been found earlier it would have been fixed earlier.If on the other hand it had been known about and exploits available, and it had never been fixed,then there would be something to get upset about.
kernel typo - (I hope)
Mike Aug 15, 2009 6:23am GMT
Uh, that applies to all kernels of the 2.4 - 2.6 series...
quote: "2.6, from 2.6.0 up to and including 2.6.30.4"
I hope this was just a typo, because leaving out that it affects the 2.6 series would be a large blunder.