Taking a stand for ethical tech
Off the Beat: Bruce Byfield's Blog
Several weeks ago, I discussed taking a stand against unethical parts of your work. Ever since the American elections, this topic has been a concern for many, so I am not surprised to see a few publicly declaring themselves. I only wish that corporate leaders would do the same.
I am talking about neveragain.tech, a statement signed by over 1400 tech workers. The signers include American employees of organizations ranging from Microsoft and the Mozilla Corporation to the GNU Project and the Kubuntu Council including such free software figures as Matthew Garrett, Matt Lee, and Valorie Zimmerman. Although the statement does not specifically mention Donald Trump, it is obviously a response to Trump's campaign promises to track Muslims and illegal immigrants.
Citing past genocides, including IBM's collaboration to manage the Holocaust, signers of the statement commit themselves to refusing to work on databases of minorities, and to advocate against such work, and destroy it or at least scale it back. In addition, signers pledge to encourage practices such as encryption that might undermine such work, to act as whistle blowers, mount legal opposition, and public opposition. Finally, "If we do not have such authority, and our organizations force us to engage in such misuse, we will resign from our positions rather than comply." The page ends with a few basic resources where you can learn more about the issues involved.
In the absence of leadership
The statement has an air of melodrama, beginning with its name and continuing throughout with such declarations as "Today we stand together to say: not on our watch, and never again." In normal times, signing such a statement might seem one step up from the Facebook activism of liking a provocative post, and, of course, the real proof lies in how many will actually carry out what they pledge.
However, while the list might be premature, its concerns cannot be altogether dismissed as alarmist. After all, recently the American president-elect attempted to identify Energy Department researchers working on climate change. To their credit, Energy Department officials refused to cooperate, even though the refusal is at best a delaying tactic.
However, this example suggests that the concerns of neveragain.tech have more credibility than they did even a few weeks ago. In fact, its signatories might conceivably find themselves on another list -- this one of enemies of the American government -- which would make the statement a tactical mistake.
In addition, this statement, signed largely by employees, appears at odds with the reactions of tech executives. Nitasha Tiku of Buzzfeed (which, is not the most reliable publication, granted) claims that Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandberg called the concerns of neveragain.tech a "straw man," which seems to suggest that she believes that signatories are setting up an imaginary issue to argue against.
Admittedly, Facebook later clarified that “No one has asked us to build a Muslim registry, and of course we would not do so.” However, all the same, Sandberg was among the dozens of technology executives at a genial ninety-minute meetng with Trump. Just before the meeting, Trump also announced that CEOs Elron Musk of Tesla, Travis Kalanick of Uber and Ginni Rometty had joined his Strategic and Policy Forum.
(Update: Alphabet, Apple, Google, Microsoft and Uber have all stated that they would not help to build a Muslim registry, yet all had executives at the meeting. None have stated their positions on other activities, and the majority of those at the meeting have yet to state a position)
These actions by technology executives could be spun in several ways. They could be interpreted as no more than an effort to work with the incoming government so long as doing so furthers corporate goals. Or maybe their actions are no more than a wait and see attitude, which seems possible given Facebook's clarification to Buzzfeed.
However, what should be a concern is that none of the technology executives who met with Trump appear to have made any attempt to define what they would and would not do. Given this absence of leadership in a developing ethical crisis, what could concerned employees do except take their own stand?
On the one hand, neveragain.tech is almost certainly premature. In years to come, it may be judged as an unjustified overreaction. On the other hand, it may be filling a gap in leadership.
And who knows? If the lists that neveragain.tech signatories fear are never compiled, perhaps one reason may be that enough people took a stand to prevent them.
comments powered by DisqusSubscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you’ve found an article to be beneficial.
News
-
Canonical Releases Ubuntu 24.04
After a brief pause because of the XZ vulnerability, Ubuntu 24.04 is now available for install.
-
Linux Servers Targeted by Akira Ransomware
A group of bad actors who have already extorted $42 million have their sights set on the Linux platform.
-
TUXEDO Computers Unveils Linux Laptop Featuring AMD Ryzen CPU
This latest release is the first laptop to include the new CPU from Ryzen and Linux preinstalled.
-
XZ Gets the All-Clear
The back door xz vulnerability has been officially reverted for Fedora 40 and versions 38 and 39 were never affected.
-
Canonical Collaborates with Qualcomm on New Venture
This new joint effort is geared toward bringing Ubuntu and Ubuntu Core to Qualcomm-powered devices.
-
Kodi 21.0 Open-Source Entertainment Hub Released
After a year of development, the award-winning Kodi cross-platform, media center software is now available with many new additions and improvements.
-
Linux Usage Increases in Two Key Areas
If market share is your thing, you'll be happy to know that Linux is on the rise in two areas that, if they keep climbing, could have serious meaning for Linux's future.
-
Vulnerability Discovered in xz Libraries
An urgent alert for Fedora 40 has been posted and users should pay attention.
-
Canonical Bumps LTS Support to 12 years
If you're worried that your Ubuntu LTS release won't be supported long enough to last, Canonical has a surprise for you in the form of 12 years of security coverage.
-
Fedora 40 Beta Released Soon
With the official release of Fedora 40 coming in April, it's almost time to download the beta and see what's new.