NFS 3 and the specter of the spoof attack
Ghost on the Loose
Host-based authentication is easy to configure, but it doesn't do much to stop uninvited guests.
The CIO of a famous credit union was fairly sure he had thought of everything: state-of-the-art antivirus tools, separate zones for desktops and servers, firewalls at strategic points, and regular operating system updates. He also favored "stable versions" of operating systems, applications, and protocols for added assurance.
Unfortunately, this CIO decided to take a short cut in setting up the file server: NFS version 3  with the legacy "host-based access control" and no special hardening. Although NFS 4 has been around for several years, many networks continue to use NFS 3 because it is simpler and it is already up and running.
Ease of use is certainly an important consideration; however, in the case of NFS, this simplicity sometimes comes with a cost. The host-based scheme used with NFS 3 has several significant problems. Also, NFS 3 transmits unencrypted data blocks (see Figure 1), it only performs rudimentary authentication, and its authorization mechanisms are easily avoided (see the "NFS Security Functions" box).
In this article, you will get a glimpse of one of the many catastrophes that can happen if you use NFS 3 without paying attention to security. Ultimately, the best solution to these sorts of problems is to upgrade to version 4, but for readers who don't have the option of an upgrade, I offer some thoughts on how to avoid these kinds of shenanigans.
NFS Security Functions
When mounting a volume, legacy NFS servers only authenticate by referring to the client IP address and a privileged port, both of which are easy to spoof. NFS provides a handle to an entity that presents credentials. Any entity presenting the handle can access the data. It is left up to the client to check access privileges. Because the protocol does not encrypt, both the handles and data are easily sniffed (see Figure 1). However, an attacker can't leverage a handle without some effort because it involves some programming. The method described in this article is far easier, and it uses only standard Linux tools.
To improve NFS, Sun originally planned on securing RPC connections via Secure RPC. But documents that cast doubt on its viability were published as early as 1995. The attack, which took a mainframe a couple of days back then, takes a modern PC just a couple of hours.
The NFS architects finally dropped Secure RPC and focused on NFS 4, which offers more in the line of security functions. Because it relies entirely on TCP, it is easier to protect with firewalls and VPNs. The RPCSEC_GSS API that NFS 4 uses also supports the use of tried-and-trusted security architectures like Kerberos for authentication purposes.
To explore some of the security issues related to NFS, Linux Magazine staged a typical attack on an NFS configuration, during which, we looked at the individual steps an attacker would take to grab the crown jewels of an unwary IT department. This scenario assumes the blackhat can access the internal network. It is unlikely that an attacker would be able to launch such an attack from across the Internet because most enterprise firewalls will succeed in preventing the intrusion.
But think about those spare network sockets in your conference room or the systems left on overnight with cleaning staff (or anyone else) poking around. Another technique gaining favor with attackers is to attach a small WLAN router to the network and leave it hidden in an empty cubicle. In other cases, the intruder might not need to sneak around at all because the attack is launched by an employee of the company.
Finding a Server
The first thing an attacker needs to do is search for NFS servers that offer their service on the enterprise network. If the IP address is unknown, an attacker will probably opt for the Nmap scanner , the tool of choice for over a decade: After identifying the possible IP range of the target for the attack, by analyzing a sniffer log, for example, the attacker will launch a targeted search. The command nmap -n -v -sS -P0 -p111 address_range searches for RPC port mappers behind TCP port 111.
Compared with a full scan with several thousand ports per system, the following search is fairly quick. Matches are stored in the upips.txt file and are then available for closer inspection:
nmap -n -v -sSVR -O -i upips.txt
The scan method -s requested here is a half-open scan (S); if this scan is successful, a version scan (V), and a query to the RPC calls (R) will follow. The results for an NFS server will look something like the output in Listing 1.
Scan Results for an NFS Server
01 Interesting ports on 192.168.1.200: 02 PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 03 21/tcp open ftp ProFTPD 1.3.0 04 22/tcp open ssh OpenSSH 4.3p2 Debian 8ubuntu1.4 (protocol 2.0) 05 111/tcp open rpcbind (rpcbind V2) 2 (rpc #100000) 06 143/tcp open imap Cyrus IMAP4 2.2.13-Debian-2.2.13-1 07 869/tcp open mountd (mountd V1-3) 1-3 (rpc #100005) 08 2049/tcp open nfs (nfs V2-4) 2-4 (rpc #100003) 09 MAC Address: 00:aa:ff:ee:01:23 (Fortytwo Systems) 10 Service Info: Host: alpha.example.com; OSs: Unix, Linux
Going to Work
NFS uses RPC for remote function invocation, introducing separate data encoding in the form of External Data Representation (XDR). The Nmap scan at least gives a clear view of the RPC calls. The rpcbind in line 5 forwards RPC queries to other ports, such as the ports for mountd (line 7), which is responsible for setting up a connection, or the nfs daemon (line 8), which delivers or accepts data. Figure 2 shows this configuration.
An attacker can glean valuable information from these services. In fact, the attacker doesn't even need special hacking tools: The admin tools provided with the distribution are just fine. One of them is called Showmount. Typing showmount -e alpha will output the NFS server's exports:
Export list for alpha: /opt/someapp * /mnt/cdrom everyone(ro) /home *.example.com,192.168.1.66
The first column contains the exported directory on server alpha – NFS refers to this as a volume. The second column tells which clients are permitted to access the volume. Different NFS servers have different ways of writing permitted client names, but whatever the syntax, the address will include IP addresses and DNS names. An asterisk or the everyone string indicates no restrictions for the volume. In many cases, admins use this option for CD-ROMs or static, read-only data. (The (ro) entry specifies read only.)
The NFS server resolves DNS names itself and thus authenticates querying clients on the basis of IP addresses. Unfortunately, it is really easy to spoof IP addresses on the local network. In this example, any DNS name from the example.com domain is permitted.
Querying the DNS Server with dig example.com axfr could return a complete list of all known hostnames and matching addresses. As an alternative, the attacker can just make an intelligent guess if a couple of hostnames are known or if some hosts have been identified with the use of a sniffer. In any case, the intruder will put together a list of matching IP addresses and check which ones they can hijack.
The addresses need to be in the segment the attacker has access to. Often this is the case if a larger number of clients mount home directories on the NFS server.
The next step is to find an authorized IP address that is currently unused. Many users switch off their computers at the end of the day. The command
ping -c3 192.168.1.66
checks to see whether the specified host is active. To do so, the tool sends three ICMP packets to the client (see Listing 2). If you want to be completely certain that the target is not simply blocking ICMP, you can additionally check whether arp -na resolves the address:
? (192.168.1.1) to 00:31:42:42:42:13 eth0 ? (192.168.1.66) to <incomplete> eth0
Although a MAC address is known for 192.168.1.1, ARP was unable to resolve the target. In other words, the address is free.
Checking the Target Address
01 # ping -c3 192.168.1.66 02 PING 192.168.1.66 (192.168.1.66) 56(84) bytes of data. 03 From 192.168.1.175 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable 04 From 192.168.1.175 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable 05 From 192.168.1.175 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable 06 07 --- 192.168.1.66 ping statistics --- 08 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, +3 errors, 100% packet loss, time 2002ms
On a Linux system, IP addresses are easily spoofed: root can just configure them on the interface:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.66 up
This hack will not work with virtual interfaces such as eth0:1: NFS clients use the first address on their interface for requests and do not configure any additional IPs. After completing the preparatory steps, the attacker can become root and type
mkdir /tmp/MNT mount -t nfs 192.168.1.200:/home /tmp/MNT
to create a local mount point and then mount the /home volume exported by NFS. If you just see a prompt after this, the connection is working.
An intruder operating as local root probably won't be able to access this volume directly. Although the superuser can typically read anything on the local disk, the NFS volume suddenly blocks read access. This effect is typically referred to as a root_squash configuration, but the setback is temporary and easy to work around.
Typing ls -ln outputs the numeric user IDs for the file owners. The attacker can then create entries for these users in the local /etc/passwd file and type su - victim to assume their identity. The intruder is now free to browse user folders, exchange SSH keys, or poke around in mail directories. In the case of the credit union, the attacker found customer data backup scripts, including clear text passwords for the database.
Buy this article as PDF
But if you are not using the latest Linux kernel, your system is insecure.
Home routers will give room for custom firmware but still comply with FCC rules
Frank Karlitschek will continue to lead the open source ownCloud project
“Xenial Xerus” comes with a new packages format and several improvements for the enterprise.
Linux users can now download and install the Windows code editor
New initiative will address security and interoperability concerns around container technology.
Developers can use RHEL as a development platform without a subscription fee.
Windows users will soon have native access to the Bash shell.
Improvements to SMTP will provide better guarantee of confidentiality
Graphics vendor embraces new reality in Linux graphics