Remembering the Rule
Welcome
The recent action by the US Federal Communications Commission to reverse previous policy and rescind net neutrality received lots of attention. Of course the geeks didn't like it, but a sizable majority of ordinary citizens didn't like it much either.
Dear Reader,
The recent action by the US Federal Communications Commission to reverse previous policy and rescind net neutrality received lots of attention. Of course the geeks didn't like it, but a sizable majority of ordinary citizens didn't like it much either. In fact, many wondered who did like it, aside from broadband service providers and those who believe the way to help America succeed is to yield to the wishes of broadband service providers. If you follow the high tech news, you know that much has already been written on this decision – including in this magazine, so I won't dwell on it for long.
What I really want to mention is a report from researchers at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, at Harvard University. The authors studied 40 community-owned ISPs and compared them to similar plans offered by commercial providers. The result was that municipal broadband providers typically charged less and offered more transparent pricing, with fewer gimmicks.
This might seem obvious – why wouldn't governments, who just want to break even, be able to provide Internet service for less than businesses, who are trying to make a profit? Plausible as this may seem, the USA runs on a deeply held conviction that businesses do things more efficiently than governments.
Unfortunately, as illuminating as this study on municipal broadband might seem, it does not totally resolve the business vs. government (capitalism vs. socialism) ideological divide. The capitalists would readily argue that business is better because it promotes competition. In some cases, they are probably correct, based on time-honored rules learned in business school and the tendency of governments to move lumberingly. But the fact is, there isn't much real competition in the broadband ISP market, so broadband isn't a very good example of a free market.
The gulf between these sweeping ideological viewpoints has led to the present state of dysfunction. One party gets in power and imposes net neutrality. The other party gets in and eliminates it. The next time the power structure in Washington shifts, the net neutrality pendulum will swing back again – unless Congress does something about it first, and (the truth be told) Congress really doesn't do very much.
So instead of working to solve the problem at a national or international level, with broad-reaching policy decisions by government-appointed czars and kingpins, the other approach is to just act locally, within your own community, and support municipal broadband.
Most municipal broadband systems are funded through bonds and do not receive direct government subsidies. They function very much like companies, but the difference is: The customers and the shareholders are the same people. They don't face the weird dilemma that broadband companies must face, where the customers and the shareholders are different people, and the best way to return value for the shareholders is to yank around the customers, which is basically what is happening with the end of net neutrality.
Acting locally is often a more reliable way of affecting public debate. You might not have a chance against an army of lobbyists in your national capital, but at your local city hall, the field really is a little closer to level. And if enough small towns and cities take up the challenge of providing their own Internet service so they can get it their own way, the commercial Internet providers might just wake up one day and remember another rule they probably learned in business school. "Oh yeah…the customer is always right."
Joe Casad, Editor in Chief
Infos
- City-Owned Internet Services Offer Cheaper and More Transparent Pricing: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/city-owned-internet-services-offer-cheaper-and-more-transparent-pricing/
Buy this article as PDF
(incl. VAT)
Buy Linux Magazine
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you’ve found an article to be beneficial.
News
-
TUXEDO Computers Unveils Linux Laptop Featuring AMD Ryzen CPU
This latest release is the first laptop to include the new CPU from Ryzen and Linux preinstalled.
-
XZ Gets the All-Clear
The back door xz vulnerability has been officially reverted for Fedora 40 and versions 38 and 39 were never affected.
-
Canonical Collaborates with Qualcomm on New Venture
This new joint effort is geared toward bringing Ubuntu and Ubuntu Core to Qualcomm-powered devices.
-
Kodi 21.0 Open-Source Entertainment Hub Released
After a year of development, the award-winning Kodi cross-platform, media center software is now available with many new additions and improvements.
-
Linux Usage Increases in Two Key Areas
If market share is your thing, you'll be happy to know that Linux is on the rise in two areas that, if they keep climbing, could have serious meaning for Linux's future.
-
Vulnerability Discovered in xz Libraries
An urgent alert for Fedora 40 has been posted and users should pay attention.
-
Canonical Bumps LTS Support to 12 years
If you're worried that your Ubuntu LTS release won't be supported long enough to last, Canonical has a surprise for you in the form of 12 years of security coverage.
-
Fedora 40 Beta Released Soon
With the official release of Fedora 40 coming in April, it's almost time to download the beta and see what's new.
-
New Pentesting Distribution to Compete with Kali Linux
SnoopGod is now available for your testing needs
-
Juno Computers Launches Another Linux Laptop
If you're looking for a powerhouse laptop that runs Ubuntu, the Juno Computers Neptune 17 v6 should be on your radar.