7%
02.02.2021
is on the rise, first consider how a conventional program processes data. Traditional software reads a chunk of data all at once and then performs operations on it. This batch technique is fine for certain types
7%
07.04.2022
added dynamically when the server was started. This method works fine for simple testing, but it can be awkward for larger tag databases.
All industrial control vendors will have proprietary solutions
7%
07.04.2022
been reduced to a fine slurry and garbled.
Linus wants clarity in all kernel patches. Among other things, it helps with debugging, when developers may need to identify an earlier patch to revert
7%
06.05.2022
this forward on the maintainers summit (https://lwn.net/Articles/738216/) and there it was discussed to basically go the route I'm taking currently. But I'm totally [fine] to adjust that route if there are good
7%
06.05.2022
files to the Raspberry Pi are at your disposal. I mounted the Raspberry Pi over SSH in the Ubuntu file manager. This simple approach usually works fine on a LAN. With more complex projects it doesn't make
7%
30.08.2021
). This is fine for installing the new operating system, but certainly not as a permanent solution. Now you can reassemble the Chromebook, plug in the battery, connect the power supply, and start recovery mode
7%
03.02.2022
."
But Greg disagreed. He felt it was a fine idea for the stable tree, and that "it will force us to keep these trees clean over time." He also added that in the "worst case, we disable it in 4 years when gcc
7%
02.03.2022
, even if the server does not offer DANE for incoming messages.
Securing the Contents
SSL is in place. Is everything fine? Not at all, because SSL only secures the TCP/IP connection between two specific
7%
04.06.2022
using applications such as Calibre, a simpler solution would do the job just fine. You can modify the script to have it sync the contents of the Library directory to a remote web server. Here's an example
7%
30.08.2021
.git and the work done in filesystem. Other than that, I'm perfectly fine with [the] maintainer sending pull request[s] directly to Linus (provided that I hadn't spotted something obviously wrong in the series
