Meet in the Middle
Rolling Versus Point Releases

Image © Alexandra, 123rf.com
Which is better: distributions that develop using point releases or those that use rolling releases?
Traditionally, new software has put forth major releases every couple of years or so, with minor releases in between for security and bug fixes. Known as point releases, this strategy continues to be the primary choice for many leading distributions such as Debian, openSUSE, and Ubuntu. However, over the years, a new strategy has emerged, with individual packages being released as soon as they are ready, rather than waiting for the next major release. Called rolling releases, this strategy is used by Arch Linux, Gentoo, and Manjaro. In any particular instance, the effectiveness of either strategy depends very much on having enough developers and upon the developers’ conscientiousness. However, both have pros and cons, which is why hybrid approaches with characteristics of both strategies are increasingly common.
Point Releases
Point releases have the advantage of tradition. They are well-established, and expertise in them is widespread. Typically, they are administered centrally, making them easy to coordinate, which is no small advantage to many projects, especially distributions, that have hundreds of maintainers and thousands of packages. Even with Snap, Flatpak, or AppImage, most packages have dependencies on other packages – sometimes dozens. As a result, maintainers usually cannot work alone, but must consult with maintainers of other packages to ensure that their work is compatible. In fact, the complexity of a major release is so great that either a development freeze is needed in order to finalize it, or else a major release is mostly a combination of all the point releases since the last one. Otherwise, a major release would be a moving target.
To further aid in the release effort, point release projects often have rigorous, comprehensive standards. For instance, the Debian guidelines are often said to be what makes Debian what it is. They are also the main reason that Debian is the foundation of choice for security-focused distributions like Kali Linux. Even Debian’s Unstable and Testing repositories are considered reliable enough for distributions like Ubuntu to draw upon them.
[...]
Buy Linux Magazine
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you’ve found an article to be beneficial.

News
-
USB4 Maintainer Leaves Intel
Michael Jamet, one of the primary maintainers of USB4 and Thunderbolt drivers, has left Intel, leaving a gaping hole for the Linux community to deal with.
-
Budgie 10.9.3 Now Available
The latest version of this elegant and configurable Linux desktop aligns with changes in Gnome 49.
-
KDE Linux Alpha Available for Daring Users
It's official, KDE Linux has arrived, but it's not quite ready for prime time.
-
AMD Initiates Graphics Driver Updates for Linux Kernel 6.18
This new AMD update focuses on power management, display handling, and hardware support for Radeon GPUs.
-
AerynOS Alpha Release Available
With a choice of several desktop environments, AerynOS 2025.08 is almost ready to be your next operating system.
-
AUR Repository Still Under DDoS Attack
Arch User Repository continues to be under a DDoS attack that has been going on for more than two weeks.
-
RingReaper Malware Poses Danger to Linux Systems
A new kind of malware exploits modern Linux kernels for I/O operations.
-
Happy Birthday, Linux
On August 25, Linux officially turns 34.
-
VirtualBox 7.2 Has Arrived
With early support for Linux kernel 6.17 and other new additions, VirtualBox 7.2 is a must-update for users.
-
Linux Mint 22.2 Beta Available for Testing
Some interesting new additions and improvements are coming to Linux Mint. Check out the Linux Mint 22.2 Beta to give it a test run.