Optimizing the Linux Kernel

Ready-to-Use Patch Sets

Manual kernel configuration is a good way to learn about the kernel. However, if you want to play it a little safer and don't have time for a deep dive, several performance-optimized custom kernels are available for download. Two popular patch sets are XanMod and Liquorix.

The overall benefit of using a custom Linux kernel will vary depending on the workload. The average boost in synthetic tests may be around five percent, but the difference in experience (for example, the start time for Firefox while playing a high-resolution video in the background) might be considerably more significant. Keep in mind that many of the described optimization techniques that involve different scheduling and changing inner kernel timers only show up when the system has a significant load. The best way to conduct a simple home-grown benchmark is to set up a resource-hogging process, such as video encoding or a huge file compression, and then try to do some normal browsing along with it. Custom-patched kernels will likely deliver a smoother experience and maintain responsiveness even if CPU usage is nearly 100 percent.

As for real-world benchmarks, I conducted a series of tests using the sysbench tool. Sysbench can stress test Linux systems and test CPU, memory, threads, and I/O performance. The tests were run against three flavors of the 5.12 kernel: the mainline Ubuntu kernel, the XanMod kernel, and the Liquorix kernel. Table 1 shows the sysbench results for my test system running on Intel Xeon E5450 with 4GB of memory and with Pop!_OS 20.04 installed on a budget SSD drive. Keep in mind that these results are from my tests run on my hardware. The developers of these projects will likely have their own tests for specific scenarios in which their kernels excel.

Table 1

Comparing Kernels





CPU operations per second




Threads: number of events




Memory: min latency (less is better)




Memory: max latency (less is better)




File I/O: writes per second




It is clear that all three kernels run very close to each other when measured for CPU performance, with XanMod only 1.3 percent faster than the generic kernel. In the threads test, the contenders showed different results as long as each used its own process/thread scheduler. The vanilla Linux kernel comes with the completely fair scheduler (CFS), which turned out to be on par with XanMod's CacULE (enhanced ULE scheduler originally derived from FreeBSD), but both lost the race to the Multiple Queue Skiplist Scheduler (MuQSS) enabled in Liquorix. It turns out that in a densely threaded environment, MuQSS scores up to 40 percent better than its rivals.

When it comes to memory latencies, you can clearly see that both kernel flavors performance-wise try their best to reduce the maximum latency value. In that regard, the record belongs to XanMod, but the average latency is still lower in Liquorix. The I/O test for sequential writing then showed that XanMod was actually more balanced, and it delivered the best throughput figures, whereas Liquorix yielded 10 percent less write speed. By the way, both XanMod and Liquorix were using Budget Fair Queues (BFQs) for handling disk loads, whereas the generic kernel stuck with mq-deadline. So, in the end, the choice comes down to the acceptable throughput trade-off for the sake of better responsiveness. Regardless of your choice, both the customized kernels will run faster than the generic kernel.


Linux was created for hacking and tinkering, and users still have many options for tweaking the Linux kernel. This article touched on a few important options, and you will find many more if you spend some time with the Linux kernel configuration menu and browse the kernel documentation [6]. Just remember that it is better to test these techniques first on a non-critical system before you roll them out on your production network.

The Author

Alexander Tolstoy is a DevOps engineer committed to improving end user experience on both server and desktop workstations running Linux. He's been up for tips and tricks in open source software for a couple of decades.

Buy this article as PDF

Express-Checkout as PDF
Price $2.95
(incl. VAT)

Buy Linux Magazine

Get it on Google Play

US / Canada

Get it on Google Play

UK / Australia

Related content

  • Working with the Kernel

    If you work with third-party hardware drivers, or even if you just need to fix a broken system, someday you might need to upgrade the Linux kernel.

  • Performance Tweaks

    If you are looking for ways to speed up your Linux, consider this collection of curated performance tweaks.

  • Kernel Tips

    Worried about a recent security exploit? Want to take advantage of a new hardware feature? You don’t need to be a Linux expert to patch and compile the Linux kernel. We'll show you how to get started.

  • Compiling the Kernel

    While not a requirement, compiling the Linux kernel lets you add or remove features depending on your specific needs and possibly make your kernel more efficient.

  • Nitrux 1.5 Ships with Kernel 5.13

    Debian-based Nitrux Linux is the first distribution to ship with kernel 5.13

comments powered by Disqus

Direct Download

Read full article as PDF:

Price $2.95