As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, many employees have exchanged the office for their home to accommodate social distancing guidelines. In addition to getting used to working from home, many telecommuters must also deal with security issues when contacting colleagues or accessing company servers. While large corporations may take care of these issues for their employees, self-employed telecommuters and small businesses need to find their own solution.

WireGuard [1], the modern virtual private network (VPN) tunnel software developed by security researcher Jason Donenfeld, offers an easy-to-implement solution that relies on encryption to secure the connection between two endpoints. WireGuard found its way into the Linux kernel 5.6 at the end of March at the same time WireGuard v1.0.0 was released. The VPN program is now available for all common operating systems such as Linux, macOS, Windows, Android, and iOS.

Competition

Before WireGuard conquered the market in 2015, IPsec and OpenVPN were the top two contenders under a free license. Compared to WireGuard, however, both IPsec and OpenVPN are more difficult to set up, which is why WireGuard was already in use before becoming a kernel module.

Linux Torvalds had hoped WireGuard would be merged to the kernel in 2018. In comparison to OpenVPN and IPSec, Torvalds has called WireGuard "a work of art" [2]. If you have followed Torvalds' statements over the years, you know that he is generally very sparing with praise.

WireGuard gets by with only about 4,000 lines of source code. In comparison, OpenVPN together with the required OpenSSL weigh in at around 600,000 lines of code, while IPsec and StrongSwan use more than 400,000 lines. WireGuard offers far less attack potential than its competitors. The software also relies on modern algorithms: ChaCha20 [3] is used for encryption, while Curve25519 handles the key exchange [4].

Fast and Frugal

WireGuard shows its advantages over the established solutions in terms of speed and resource consumption. This manifests itself in far faster and more stable connections, especially when roaming. While OpenVPN often consumes 30 percent of battery power on Android, WireGuard keeps this in the lower single-digit range.

We tested WireGuard with Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, which comes with the backported module for WireGuard in kernel 5.4. Ubuntu users were already interested in WireGuard before its inclusion in the kernel, as evidenced by over 20,000 installations from the WireGuard PPA. There is also a backport for Debian 10 Buster.

Not Just for Linux

WireGuard can also be used with OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, macOS, and Microsoft Windows (a stable version is imminent for Windows). For road warriors, there are apps for Android and iOS. You will want to use the original apps rather than third-party apps [5].

You can use WireGuard with modest hardware resources. In terms of the server, you don't need anything faster than an older laptop, a single board computer like the Raspberry Pi, or a rented V-Server on the web. In our test, we used a ThinkPad X220, a device that has been out of service for quite some time (see the box "DynDNS and Port Forwarding"). WireGuard supports constellations with two clients or with one server and multiple clients.