Combining directories from multiple servers on a single mountpoint
Test Results
Table 2 lists the IOzone results for NFS and SSHFS from the previous article with the results for the five SSHFSM test sets:
- Baseline: Use all system and SSHFS-MUX defaults
- OPT1: SSHFS-MUX mount option tuning
- OPT2: OPT1 with TCP tuning
- OPT3: OPT2 with stronger encryption (aes-128)
- OPT4: OPT3 with compression turned on
Table 2
Results of Five Test Sets for All Six Test
Sequential | Random |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test | Write (MBps) | Re-write (MBps) | Read (MBps) | Re-read (MBps) | Write IOPS | Read IOPS |
NFS |
||||||
Baseline |
83.996 |
87.391 |
114.301 |
114.314 |
13,554 |
5,095 |
TCP optimizations |
96.334 |
92.349 |
120.010 |
120.189 |
13,345 |
5,278 |
Baseline |
||||||
SSHFS |
43.182 |
49.459 |
54.757 |
63.667 |
12,574 |
2,859 |
SSHFSM |
43.207 |
52.068 |
54.746 |
63.437 |
12,848 |
2,892 |
OPT1 |
||||||
SSHFS |
81.646 |
85.747 |
112.987 |
131.187 |
21,533 |
3,033 |
SSHFSM |
85.904 |
88.210 |
112.963 |
130.861 |
20,447 |
3,315 |
OPT2 |
||||||
SSHFS |
111.864 |
119.196 |
119.153 |
136.081 |
29,802 |
3,237 |
SSHFSM |
113.567 |
120.037 |
119.072 |
136.104 |
29,802 |
3,038 |
OPT3 |
||||||
SSHFS |
51.325 |
56.328 |
58.231 |
67.588 |
14,100 |
2,860 |
SSHFSM |
54.595 |
61.111 |
67.107 |
67.379 |
13,958 |
2,670 |
OPT4 |
||||||
SSHFS |
78.600 |
79.589 |
158.020 |
158.925 |
19,326 |
2,892 |
SSHFSM |
83.120 |
86.599 |
156.035 |
155.923 |
19,439 |
2,767 |
To help visualize the data, the six bar charts in Figures 6-8 plot the results for all five test sets, one for each test.



Comparing the performance of SSHFS and SSHFSM is rather interesting. In general, the performance is quite close except in a couple of instances. For example, in the sequential write tests, SSHFSM is sometimes up to 5 percent faster than SSHFS. SSHFSM in the OPT4 results for the sequential re-write test is almost 9 percent faster than SSHFS. For the sequential read, re-read, and random read IOPS, SSHFS is sometimes slightly faster than SSHFSM. However, this comparison might not be that useful because the "spread" of the performance results is unknown, and one can't conclusively say one is faster than the others.
Comparing SSHFS and SSHFSM performance to NFS is perhaps more useful from a qualitative standpoint. When all the SSHFMS and TCP optimizations are used, SSHFS and SSHFSM has better write performance (sequential write and re-write, and random write IOPS). Even if a stronger encryption is used, which requires more computational capability, SSHFS and SSHFSM can be just as good or better than NFS for write tests. However, read performance for SSHFS and SSHFSM is worse or only close to NFS performance until compression is turned on (compression turned on results are OPT4). A remarkable result is that SSHFS and SSHFSM performance for the random read IOPS test is never better than about 60 percent that of NFS.
Summary
SSHFS has great potential as a shared filesystem. It encrypts data in flight, it allows users to control what filesystems they mount, and it only requires an open SSH port (port 22). With some tuning, you can get SSHFS performance on the same level as NFS, except for the random read IOPS performance. However, the price you pay is data encryption or decryption on both the client and server.
In the pursuit of even more performance, I tried SSHFS-MUX. SSHFSM is derived from SSHFS and has been extended to allow several directories to be mounted in a single mountpoint. I didn't test this feature, but I did test the performance of SSHFS-MUX relative to SSHFS. Although the tests I ran here are not as extensive as those I would perform for benchmarking, casual testing allowed me to gauge general performance differences. In some cases, SSHFS-MUX was a little faster than SSHFS, but it was fairly small, only about 5 percent for some cases.
For anyone considering using SSHFS, SSHFS-MUX, with its ability to combine directories from different servers into a single mountpoint, is a definite option.
Infos
- SSHFS: http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html
- "SSHFS – Installation and Performance" by Jeff Layton: http://www.admin-magazine.com/HPC/Articles/Sharing-Data-with-SSHFS
- SSHFS-MUX: https://code.google.com/p/sshfsmux/
- Dun Nan research: http://web.yl.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~dunnan/
- Dun Nan: http://www.cs.uchicago.edu/people/dun
- IOzone: http://www.iozone.org/
- Arcfour: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RC4
- Arcfour cipher speed: http://superuser.com/questions/32884/sshfs-mount-without-compression-or-encryption
- "OpenSSH ( SSHD ) Speed Optimization For Long Distance Data Transfer" by Nix Craft, http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/sshd-server-optimization.html
« Previous 1 2
Buy this article as PDF
(incl. VAT)
Buy Linux Magazine
Direct Download
Read full article as PDF:
Price $2.95
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you've found an article to be beneficial.
News
-
Armbian 23.05 is Now Available
Based on Debian 12, the latest version of the ARM/RISC-V distribution is now available to download and install.
-
Linux Mint Finally Receiving Support for Gestures
If you use the Linux Mint Cinnamon desktop, you'll be thrilled to know that 21.2 is getting support for gestures on touchscreen devices and touchpads.
-
An All-Snap Version of Ubuntu is In The Works
Along with the standard deb version of the open-source operating system, Canonical will release an-all snap version.
-
Mageia 9 Beta 2 Ready for Testing
The latest beta of the popular Mageia distribution now includes the latest kernel and plenty of updated applications.
-
KDE Plasma 6 Looks to Bring Basic HDR Support
The KWin piece of KDE Plasma now has HDR support and color management geared for the 6.0 release.
-
Bodhi Linux 7.0 Beta Ready for Testing
The latest iteration of the Bohdi Linux distribution is now available for those who want to experience what's in store and for testing purposes.
-
Changes Coming to Ubuntu PPA Usage
The way you manage Personal Package Archives will be changing with the release of Ubuntu 23.10.
-
AlmaLinux 9.2 Now Available for Download
AlmaLinux has been released and provides a free alternative to upstream Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
-
An Immutable Version of Fedora Is Under Consideration
For anyone who's a fan of using immutable versions of Linux, the Fedora team is currently considering adding a new spin called Fedora Onyx.
-
New Release of Br OS Includes ChatGPT Integration
Br OS 23.04 is now available and is geared specifically toward web content creation.