Remembering the Rule
Welcome

The recent action by the US Federal Communications Commission to reverse previous policy and rescind net neutrality received lots of attention. Of course the geeks didn't like it, but a sizable majority of ordinary citizens didn't like it much either.
Dear Reader,
The recent action by the US Federal Communications Commission to reverse previous policy and rescind net neutrality received lots of attention. Of course the geeks didn't like it, but a sizable majority of ordinary citizens didn't like it much either. In fact, many wondered who did like it, aside from broadband service providers and those who believe the way to help America succeed is to yield to the wishes of broadband service providers. If you follow the high tech news, you know that much has already been written on this decision – including in this magazine, so I won't dwell on it for long.
What I really want to mention is a report from researchers at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, at Harvard University. The authors studied 40 community-owned ISPs and compared them to similar plans offered by commercial providers. The result was that municipal broadband providers typically charged less and offered more transparent pricing, with fewer gimmicks.
This might seem obvious – why wouldn't governments, who just want to break even, be able to provide Internet service for less than businesses, who are trying to make a profit? Plausible as this may seem, the USA runs on a deeply held conviction that businesses do things more efficiently than governments.
Unfortunately, as illuminating as this study on municipal broadband might seem, it does not totally resolve the business vs. government (capitalism vs. socialism) ideological divide. The capitalists would readily argue that business is better because it promotes competition. In some cases, they are probably correct, based on time-honored rules learned in business school and the tendency of governments to move lumberingly. But the fact is, there isn't much real competition in the broadband ISP market, so broadband isn't a very good example of a free market.
The gulf between these sweeping ideological viewpoints has led to the present state of dysfunction. One party gets in power and imposes net neutrality. The other party gets in and eliminates it. The next time the power structure in Washington shifts, the net neutrality pendulum will swing back again – unless Congress does something about it first, and (the truth be told) Congress really doesn't do very much.
So instead of working to solve the problem at a national or international level, with broad-reaching policy decisions by government-appointed czars and kingpins, the other approach is to just act locally, within your own community, and support municipal broadband.
Most municipal broadband systems are funded through bonds and do not receive direct government subsidies. They function very much like companies, but the difference is: The customers and the shareholders are the same people. They don't face the weird dilemma that broadband companies must face, where the customers and the shareholders are different people, and the best way to return value for the shareholders is to yank around the customers, which is basically what is happening with the end of net neutrality.
Acting locally is often a more reliable way of affecting public debate. You might not have a chance against an army of lobbyists in your national capital, but at your local city hall, the field really is a little closer to level. And if enough small towns and cities take up the challenge of providing their own Internet service so they can get it their own way, the commercial Internet providers might just wake up one day and remember another rule they probably learned in business school. "Oh yeah…the customer is always right."
Joe Casad, Editor in Chief
Infos
- City-Owned Internet Services Offer Cheaper and More Transparent Pricing: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/01/city-owned-internet-services-offer-cheaper-and-more-transparent-pricing/
Buy this article as PDF
(incl. VAT)
Buy Linux Magazine
Direct Download
Read full article as PDF:
Price $2.95
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you've found an article to be beneficial.
News
-
Armbian 23.05 is Now Available
Based on Debian 12, the latest version of the ARM/RISC-V distribution is now available to download and install.
-
Linux Mint Finally Receiving Support for Gestures
If you use the Linux Mint Cinnamon desktop, you'll be thrilled to know that 21.2 is getting support for gestures on touchscreen devices and touchpads.
-
An All-Snap Version of Ubuntu is In The Works
Along with the standard deb version of the open-source operating system, Canonical will release an-all snap version.
-
Mageia 9 Beta 2 Ready for Testing
The latest beta of the popular Mageia distribution now includes the latest kernel and plenty of updated applications.
-
KDE Plasma 6 Looks to Bring Basic HDR Support
The KWin piece of KDE Plasma now has HDR support and color management geared for the 6.0 release.
-
Bodhi Linux 7.0 Beta Ready for Testing
The latest iteration of the Bohdi Linux distribution is now available for those who want to experience what's in store and for testing purposes.
-
Changes Coming to Ubuntu PPA Usage
The way you manage Personal Package Archives will be changing with the release of Ubuntu 23.10.
-
AlmaLinux 9.2 Now Available for Download
AlmaLinux has been released and provides a free alternative to upstream Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
-
An Immutable Version of Fedora Is Under Consideration
For anyone who's a fan of using immutable versions of Linux, the Fedora team is currently considering adding a new spin called Fedora Onyx.
-
New Release of Br OS Includes ChatGPT Integration
Br OS 23.04 is now available and is geared specifically toward web content creation.