Debian Freeze for Squeeze Policy Reconsidered
The Debian release team decided on July 29 to adopt a two-year development freeze cycle for its 6.0 "Squeeze" release. A day's worth of discussion to follow led the team to revise its plans again.
According to Debian's decision, freezes are to happen in the December of odd-numbered years, with releases in the following even-numbered year. According to this plan the freeze for the next major version "Squeeze" should have been December 2009 with its release in the first half of 2010. Only a day later, things changed again along the lines of "that was then, this is now" with a follow-up announcement.
Considering the release goals and "in consideration of the Debian community's feedback to the release team's initial announcement," the team decided to "revisit its decision on December 2009 as the proposed freeze date" as part of its latest news releases. Early September would bring a new timeline announcement. "Debian community's feedback" could be a euphomism for some of the enraged responses from project circles who were gearing themselves for a definitive freeze timeline. Part of the confusion could have come from media misinterpretation that a freeze cycle meant a release cycle.
The distinction proves to be fairly minor, however, unless you consider that the notorious "Sarge" release lasted one whole year in freeze status. A Debian "freeze" actually means "feature freeze," where no new features are integrated, only bug fixes. The release will then not go out until all Release Critical (RC) bugs are removed, which typically (and by Debian quality standards workably) takes half a year. A freeze in December would then provide a release more or less midway into the following year.
That a Debian release could possibly be planned for a specific year seemed to be blasphemous enough for many project adherents to bring them to the baricades. The deeper reason for a set-in-stone freeze date might also be coordinating the Debian and Ubuntu release dates, as Mark Shuttleworth has continually recommended in his call for a release "pulse." Many Debian developers, however, worry about getting into a disadvantaged situation with Ubuntu, with its "one generation ahead" policy, and possibly losing customers to them. Debian's attitude has always rather been "It's ready when it's ready."
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you’ve found an article to be beneficial.

News
-
TuxCare Announces Support for AlmaLinux 9.2
Thanks to TuxCare, AlmaLinux 9.2 (and soon version 9.6) now enjoys years of ongoing patching and compliance.
-
Go-Based Botnet Attacking IoT Devices
Using an SSH credential brute-force attack, the Go-based PumaBot is exploiting IoT devices everywhere.
-
Plasma 6.5 Promises Better Memory Optimization
With the stable Plasma 6.4 on the horizon, KDE has a few new tricks up its sleeve for Plasma 6.5.
-
KaOS 2025.05 Officially Qt5 Free
If you're a fan of independent Linux distributions, the team behind KaOS is proud to announce the latest iteration that includes kernel 6.14 and KDE's Plasma 6.3.5.
-
Linux Kernel 6.15 Now Available
The latest Linux kernel is now available with several new features/improvements and the usual bug fixes.
-
Microsoft Makes Surprising WSL Announcement
In a move that might surprise some users, Microsoft has made Windows Subsystem for Linux open source.
-
Red Hat Releases RHEL 10 Early
Red Hat quietly rolled out the official release of RHEL 10.0 a bit early.
-
openSUSE Joins End of 10
openSUSE has decided to not only join the End of 10 movement but it also will no longer support the Deepin Desktop Environment.
-
New Version of Flatpak Released
Flatpak 1.16.1 is now available as the latest, stable version with various improvements.
-
IBM Announces Powerhouse Linux Server
IBM has unleashed a seriously powerful Linux server with the LinuxONE Emperor 5.