How Flatpak, AppImage, and Snap are changing software distribution
Ship It!

© Lead Image © kurhan, 123RF.com
Modern-day package systems solve some problems posed by classic formats like DEB and RPM. We look at Flatpak, AppImage, and Snap and describe how they differ.
Traditional package managers like APT, DNF, and Pacman have served Linux users well for decades, but they come with inherent complexities, dependencies, and compatibility challenges. In response to these limitations, three modern packaging formats have emerged as contenders for the future of Linux application distribution: Flatpak, AppImage, and Snap. If you've been around Linux for the past few years, you've probably heard these terms a lot. Many users adopt one of these package formats because they need it to install an application – or because they use a distro where the format is favored – without a clear understanding of what these formats really are, how they are different from their predecessors, and how they differ from each other. The goal of this article is to shed some light on these recent innovations in package technology.
Each of these formats aims to simplify software distribution, enhance security, and improve application portability, but they do so in different ways. Flatpak is designed with sandboxing and cross-distribution compatibility in mind. AppImage, on the other hand, offers a lightweight, self-contained approach that requires no installation, emphasizing portability and simplicity. Snap, backed by Canonical, integrates deeply with Ubuntu while offering transactional updates and strong security features.
The Problem
For decades, Linux software distribution relied on traditional package managers such as APT (Debian/Ubuntu), DNF/YUM (Fedora/RHEL), and Pacman (Arch Linux). These systems, while effective, came with significant challenges that became increasingly apparent as Linux gained popularity across different distributions and user bases. One of the main issues was dependency management: Software packages often require specific versions of shared libraries, leading to "dependency hell," where installing or updating one application could break another due to conflicting requirements. Furthermore, software packaged for one distribution was rarely compatible with another, forcing developers to either maintain multiple versions of their applications or rely on third-party maintainers, which often caused delays in software availability. Additionally, security concerns arose due to packages running with system-wide privileges, making applications more vulnerable to system-wide exploits.
[...]
Buy this article as PDF
(incl. VAT)
Buy Linux Magazine
Subscribe to our Linux Newsletters
Find Linux and Open Source Jobs
Subscribe to our ADMIN Newsletters
Support Our Work
Linux Magazine content is made possible with support from readers like you. Please consider contributing when you’ve found an article to be beneficial.

News
-
There's a New Linux AI Assistant in Town
Newelle is a Linux AI assistant that can work with different LLMs and includes document parsing and profiles.
-
Linux Kernel 6.16 Released with Minor Fixes
The latest Linux kernel doesn't really include any big-ticket features, just a lot of lines of code.
-
EU Sovereign Tech Fund Gains Traction
OpenForum Europe recently released a report regarding a sovereign tech fund with backing from several significant entities.
-
FreeBSD Promises a Full Desktop Installer
FreeBSD has lacked an option to include a full desktop environment during installation.
-
Linux Hits an Important Milestone
If you pay attention to the news in the Linux-sphere, you've probably heard that the open source operating system recently crashed through a ceiling no one thought possible.
-
Plasma Bigscreen Returns
A developer discovered that the Plasma Bigscreen feature had been sitting untouched, so he decided to do something about it.
-
CachyOS Now Lets Users Choose Their Shell
Imagine getting the opportunity to select which shell you want during the installation of your favorite Linux distribution. That's now a thing.
-
Wayland 1.24 Released with Fixes and New Features
Wayland continues to move forward, while X11 slowly vanishes into the shadows, and the latest release includes plenty of improvements.
-
Bugs Found in sudo
Two critical flaws allow users to gain access to root privileges.
-
Fedora Continues 32-Bit Support
In a move that should come as a relief to some portions of the Linux community, Fedora will continue supporting 32-bit architecture.